IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4458-d1933959.html

A Quantitative Investigation of the Effects of Landscape Composition and Spatial Configuration on Epigaeic Arthropods

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Guo

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Cultivated Land System Protection, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Zhuoming Dou

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Cultivated Land System Protection, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Yufei Zhang

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Cultivated Land System Protection, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, China)

  • Zijiao Yang

    (College of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110161, China
    Key Laboratory of Cultivated Land System Protection, Department of Natural Resources of Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110866, China)

Abstract

In recent years, the homogenization and fragmentation of agricultural landscapes have intensified, leading to a decline in epigaeic arthropods. Landscape heterogeneity is a core factor regulating biodiversity, encompassing two key dimensions: composition heterogeneity and spatial configuration heterogeneity. Both landscape composition and spatial configuration heterogeneity influence the distribution of epigaeic arthropods through independent and joint effects. However, quantitative evidence addressing their relative and combined influences remains limited. This study was conducted across 30 independent landscape units (1 km × 1 km) in Changtu County. Pitfall traps were deployed across different habitat types, with three traps per habitat. The proportion of semi-natural habitats was used as an indicator of landscape compositional heterogeneity, while multiple landscape metrics were used to characterize spatial configuration heterogeneity. The effects of landscape heterogeneity on epigaeic arthropods were evaluated using two response variables: activity density (mean number of individuals captured per trap) and diversity (effective number of species). Variance partitioning analysis (VPA) and Bioenv analysis were applied to explore their individual and joint effects on epigaeic arthropods. The results showed that higher landscape composition heterogeneity was associated with greater activity density of epigaeic arthropods, but no significant correlation was found with arthropod diversity. In terms of landscape spatial configuration, patch density (PD) and landscape division index (DIVISION) constituted the optimal model explaining the activity density of epigaeic arthropods, highlighting the importance of patch structure within landscapes. Furthermore, spatial configurational heterogeneity showed a stronger independent contribution than compositional heterogeneity, although their joint effect accounted for the largest proportion of explained variation. These findings provide a theoretical basis for landscape optimization and biodiversity conservation in intensive agricultural regions of Northeast China.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Guo & Zhuoming Dou & Yufei Zhang & Zijiao Yang, 2026. "A Quantitative Investigation of the Effects of Landscape Composition and Spatial Configuration on Epigaeic Arthropods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4458-:d:1933959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4458-:d:1933959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.