Author
Listed:
- Muhammad Sajjad Ansar
(School of Urban and Regional Planning, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)
- Raktim Mitra
(School of Urban and Regional Planning, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada)
Abstract
Cycling is widely recognized as a sustainable urban mobility solution, and many municipalities focus on cycling infrastructure expansion to promote improved environmental sustainability. However, the current literature on cycling has predominantly focused on safety and health benefits, while the environmental benefits including GHG mitigation benefits remain less explored. To summarize findings from the current literature that explore the GHG emissions-related benefits (or costs) of cycling infrastructure, we conducted a literature review using five major scientific databases, following the PRISMA guidelines. Out of 824 screened records, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were published in the last decade, reflecting a limited but growing interest in this topic. The current analytical approaches include mode shift analysis, life cycle assessment, and scenario modelling. Among these, mode shift analysis (i.e., assessing the potential benefits related to replacement of car trips with cycling) remains a commonly used method. We found that cycling offers significant operational benefits by reducing GHG emissions, especially in the context of large-scale expansions of cycling infrastructure. Existing research indicates that even when embodied emissions are considered, bicycle is a more sustainable mode of transportation compared to cars or even public transit. However, emissions associated with installation and maintenance of cycling infrastructure may sometimes negate the GHG benefits associated with additional cycling. We discussed gaps in the current literature and directions for future research.
Suggested Citation
Muhammad Sajjad Ansar & Raktim Mitra, 2026.
"Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Benefits of Cycling Infrastructure: Insights from Existing Research,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4414-:d:1933033
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4414-:d:1933033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.