IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4390-d1932176.html

Between Commitment and Practice—Sustainability Attitudes and Behaviors in Spain—A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Marc Compte-Pujol

    (Department of Communication, Open University of Catalonia, 08018 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón

    (Department of Communication, FCRI Blanquerna-Ramon Llull University, 08001 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Pedro Mir-Bernal

    (ISEM Fashion Business School, University of Navarra, 28027 Madrid, Spain)

  • Jesús Cabero-Fuertes

    (Department of Economics, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain)

Abstract

This sequential mixed-methods study examines when sustainability becomes a meaningful criterion in everyday consumption versus a widely endorsed discourse enacted selectively in Spain. Informed by research on the attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption, including work using TPB- and norm-based perspectives, the study explores how feasibility constraints and credibility concerns shape the translation of sustainability commitment into practice in a non-student adult sample. It addresses a recurring pattern in sustainable consumption research: strong normative endorsement often coexists with partial behavioral uptake, particularly when feasibility constraints (cost, convenience, perceived impact) and credibility concerns (skepticism/greenwashing perceptions) intervene. A focus group ( n = 9) explored how participants define sustainability, justify conditional enactment, and interpret sustainability communication; these insights informed and refined an online survey ( N = 317) capturing awareness, conceptual knowledge, concern, self-perceived behavior, practice adoption, willingness to change, and perceptions of sustainability as marketing/politics. Self-reported awareness was high (83.91%) and mean concern was 7.40/10, whereas mean self-assessed sustainable behavior was lower (6.20/10), indicating a commitment–practice gap. Most respondents reported at least one sustainable practice (98.42%) and expressed willingness to change habits (96.21%), yet intentions appeared stronger than current uptake for higher-effort changes. Associations between attitudinal endorsement and enactment were modest to moderate: concern was positively related to self-assessed sustainable behavior (Spearman’s ρ = 0.445) and to reported practice adoption (practice count; ρ ≈ 0.34), while self-assessed behavior was moderately related to practice adoption (ρ ≈ 0.48). Qualitative findings emphasized feasibility trade-offs and credibility discounting of sustainability claims. By combining interpretive evidence with survey patterns, the study shows that sustainability is widely endorsed in this sample but enacted unevenly, with feasibility and credibility helping to explain why commitment does not consistently translate into practice in the Spanish context.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc Compte-Pujol & Joan-Francesc Fondevila-Gascón & Pedro Mir-Bernal & Jesús Cabero-Fuertes, 2026. "Between Commitment and Practice—Sustainability Attitudes and Behaviors in Spain—A Mixed-Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-32, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4390-:d:1932176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4390-:d:1932176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.