Author
Listed:
- Aysegul Demir Yildirim
(Department of Actuarial Science, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Türkiye
General Directorate of Agricultural Enterprises (TIGEM), Ankara 06560, Türkiye)
- Kasirga Yildirak
(Department of Actuarial Science, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06800, Türkiye)
Abstract
State-owned agricultural enterprises face intensifying sustainability pressures, yet conventional Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures often mask site-specific operational risks. This study develops a Measurement–Reporting–Verification (MRV)-oriented sustainability internal audit framework for the General Directorate of Agricultural Enterprises (TIGEM) and pilots it across three enterprises (Ceylanpinar, Gozlu, and Karacabey). Utilizing a design-science approach, the model integrates 88 indicators derived from international frameworks (GRI, B Corp, IRIS+) and EU Green Deal requirements with a qualitative risk taxonomy. The results demonstrate that aggregate sustainability scores can obscure critical “Red Zone” risks. Ceylanpinar’s performance is severely constrained by an energy–water nexus (339.2 GWh irrigation demand vs. 263 mm rainfall), while Karacabey faces significant fossil fuel dependency and animal welfare challenges (9.2% calf mortality). Furthermore, the audit identifies tangible legal exposure in Ceylanpinar through 29 labor-related lawsuits linked to subcontracting. The study concludes that bridging the sustainability implementation gap requires a shift from symbolic disclosure to operationalized internal control. These findings provide a preliminary and context-specific roadmap for internal auditors to enhance institutional resilience against climate exposure and global carbo border adjustments (CBAM) in the agricultural sector.
Suggested Citation
Aysegul Demir Yildirim & Kasirga Yildirak, 2026.
"Sustainability Auditing in State-Owned Agricultural Enterprises: A TIGEM Pilot on the Energy–Water Nexus,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4357-:d:1930679
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4357-:d:1930679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.