IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4351-d1930569.html

Impact of Emergency Industry Demonstration Base Policy on the Effectiveness of Safety Production Governance for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Multi-Temporal DID Based on Provincial Panel Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jiale Zhang

    (School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Zhihong Li

    (School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

  • Jun Tang

    (School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)

Abstract

The implementation of the national emergency industry demonstration bases’ policies is a new way to achieve safety production governance and a key factor in improving the effectiveness of national safety production governance. This study regards China’s national emergency industry demonstration bases’ policies as a quasi-natural experiment. Based on panel data from 31 provinces in China from 2010 to 2022, a multi-period difference in differences (DID) model is conducted to systematically evaluate the impact and mechanism of this policy on China’s safety production governance. The results show that this policy significantly reduced the death rate of safety production accidents with a GDP of 100 million yuan and has a significant governance improvement effect. Further analysis of the mediating effect shows that policies mainly exert governance effects by increasing public safety financial investment and promoting innovation output. The heterogeneity analysis results indicate that policy effects are more significant in regions with weaker energy-resource industrial bases and lower levels of digital development, suggesting that the marginal governance benefits of policies are mainly concentrated in areas with relatively weak supporting conditions for safety governance. This study makes three primary contributions to the literature. Theoretically, it expands the safety governance paradigm by shifting the focus from traditional administrative “command and control” regulations to market-driven industrial agglomeration. Methodologically, by utilizing a multi-period DID model, it overcomes endogeneity issues prevalent in prior correlation-based studies to rigorously identify causal effects. Empirically, it opens the “black box” of policy transmission by validating dual pathways—fiscal resource allocation and technological innovation—while highlighting a critical “filling the gap” marginal utility effect in resource-constrained regions. This study empirically reveals the mechanism and context-dependent characteristics of industrial policies in safety governance, providing empirical evidence for understanding the inherent logic between industrial policies, public safety governance, and regional sustainable development. It offers practical insights for optimizing the precise implementation and resource allocation of emergency industrial policies to foster socially sustainable and resilient industrial growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiale Zhang & Zhihong Li & Jun Tang, 2026. "Impact of Emergency Industry Demonstration Base Policy on the Effectiveness of Safety Production Governance for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Multi-Temporal DID Based on Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4351-:d:1930569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4351-:d:1930569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.