Author
Listed:
- Changqiu Wen
(School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Wenzhou University of Technology, Wenzhou 325000, China)
- Yuanfeng Cai
(International College, National Institute of Development Administration, Klong-Chan, Bangkapi, Bangkok 10240, Thailand)
- Timothy Lee
(Faculty of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wai Long, Taipa, Macao SAR 999078, China
Swiss Hotel Management School, Caux Campus, 1824 Montreux, Switzerland
School of Tourism & Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)
Abstract
Despite the growing interest in organic personal care products (OPCPs), their repurchase remains challenging, as product quality may be difficult to verify even after use. Integrating the theory of consumption values (TCV) with reference dependence theory (RDT), this study conceptualizes post-use loyalty as a comparative benchmarking process and positions comparative perceived quality (CPQ) as a mechanism linking realized values to repurchase intention (RPI). Using survey data from 298 OPCP consumers, we employed partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), necessary condition analysis (NCA), and importance–performance map analysis (IPMA). The results indicate that efficacy, hedonic, and health values are positively associated with RPI, whereas environmental value is associated with CPQ rather than directly with RPI. CPQ mediates the effects of efficacy and hedonic value on RPI, lending support to comparative evaluation in post-use loyalty formation. Consumer expertise also conditions these relationships, with environmental value more salient among higher-expertise consumers and hedonic cues more influential among lower-expertise consumers. NCA suggests threshold effects for stronger repurchase outcomes, while IPMA highlights consumer expertise as an important but underperforming lever. Overall, the study provides a diagnostic account of the trial–repurchase gap in OPCPs and offers insights into retention in sustainability-oriented credence-based categories.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4331-:d:1929853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.