Author
Listed:
- Seong-Woo Lee
(Department of Energy Policy, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)
- Min-Ki Hyun
(Department of Energy Policy, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)
- Seung-Hoon Yoo
(Department of Future Energy Convergence, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Given South Korea’s acute land constraints and ambitious renewable energy targets, floating solar farms (FSFs) on multi-purpose dam reservoirs offer a sustainable land-sparing solution for advancing the water-energy nexus and climate adaptation. This study estimates households’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a tariff premium supporting FSFs on multi-purpose dam reservoirs—a bundled sustainability attribute encompassing land-sparing deployment, water-energy nexus synergies (90% evaporation reduction, hydropower complementarity), and avoided land-use conflicts—relative to equivalent electricity from land-based solar farms (LSFs). The valuation scenario explicitly frames FSFs as an integrated policy package, not an isolated engineering characteristic, with balanced disclosure of location-specific trade-offs. The study highlights the sustainability value of land-sparing water-energy nexus solutions in South Korea. The analysis draws on a nationwide contingent valuation survey of 1000 households conducted from mid-April to mid-May 2025. Employing the one-and-one-half-bound dichotomous choice format with a spike model to handle zero WTP responses, we estimate a mean tariff premium of KRW 26.8 (USc 1.9) per kWh—17% of the residential rate. This exceeds the current FSF-LSF levelized cost differential (KRW 19 per kWh), despite 49% zero bids largely from protest responses. Socioeconomic factors (education, income, female gender, metropolitan residence, policy awareness) significantly shape acceptance probabilities. These findings affirm meaningful support for FSF deployment, contributing to long-term sustainability by integrating renewable energy with water resource management and reducing land-use conflicts. They also inform sustainable energy transition policies by showing that consumers are willing to fund multifunctional infrastructure synergies.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4321-:d:1929649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.