IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4313-d1929526.html

Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approaches for Sustainable Forklift Selection with a Real-Life Application in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Selin Çabuk

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Çukurova University, Sarıçam, 01330 Adana, Turkey)

Abstract

Sustainable forklift technologies have become essential in modern industrial logistics due to increasing environmental regulations, rising energy costs, and heightened occupational safety requirements. Given the complexity and variety of sustainable forklift options, selecting the most appropriate one has become a critical multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem for companies. This study aims to determine the most appropriate sustainable forklifts by considering multiple qualitative and quantitative criteria that play a critical role in the forklift selection process of companies. To this end, meetings are conducted with managers possessing expertise in sustainability and logistics at companies operating in Turkey. Based on these insights, ten forklift alternatives and six evaluation criteria are identified. This is the first time, in this study, sustainability criteria such as sustainability in occupational health and safety, sustainability in agility, sustainability in ergonomics, durability and material sustainability, sustainability in load lifting capacity and sustainability in price are incorporated into the evaluation. To the best of our knowledge, no study in existing literature has specifically focused on sustainable forklift selection, incorporating the comprehensive sustainability-oriented criteria considered in this study. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to determine the weight of each criterion. Subsequently, forklift alternatives are ranked using the Multi-objective Optimization by Ratio Analysis (MOORA) ratio approach, the Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS), and the Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) methods. Moreover, weights derived based on different subjective and objective weighting schemes, specifically FUCOM, BWM, and Entropy, as well as the resulting ranking outcomes are comparatively examined to assess the impact of varying weighting structures on the robustness and consistency of the final decision results. The proposed methodology is applied within manufacturing and logistics companies in Turkey to assess its practical effectiveness. As a result of this study, the most appropriate sustainable forklifts for the companies are identified. Furthermore, the outcomes of the applied methods yield consistent/similar results. The results emphasize that managers should place greater importance on the criteria of sustainability in occupational health and safety—identified as the most critical factor—followed by durability and material sustainability, and sustainability in load lifting capacity when selecting forklifts. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the method yields consistent and effective results. Moreover, it demonstrates the robustness and accuracy of the forklift evaluations. In this context, this study serves as a guided reference for companies in the selection of sustainable forklifts.

Suggested Citation

  • Selin Çabuk, 2026. "Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approaches for Sustainable Forklift Selection with a Real-Life Application in Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-50, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4313-:d:1929526
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4313/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4313/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4313-:d:1929526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.