IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4296-d1929118.html

Interval-Based Design Rules for Fixed External Louvers in Glass Curtain Wall Office Buildings for Early-Stage Sustainable Design: A Case Study in Tianjin

Author

Listed:
  • Jiakai Song

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Mingyu Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

Fixed external louvers are widely used to improve the environmental performance of glass curtain wall office buildings, yet existing studies more often report preferred solutions than transferable decision ranges for early-stage design. This study develops interval-based design rules for a standard-floor prototype of a point-supported glass curtain wall office building in Tianjin, a representative cold-climate city in China. A seven-variable design space integrating spatial-scale and shading variables was evaluated for 3000 Latin hypercube samples in a Rhino–Grasshopper–Honeybee workflow linked to Radiance and EnergyPlus, using Tianjin’s typical meteorological year data and GB 55015—2021-based office schedules, including an occupant density of 10 m 2 /person and occupied heating/cooling setpoints of 20/26 °C. Raw-sample statistics, Bootstrap-based stability testing, and surrogate-model-assisted continuous-response analysis were used to identify dominant variables, single-objective preferred intervals, and a neutral equal-weight baseline compromise zone. Under a neutral equal-weight baseline adopted for early-stage comparison, the compromise interval is concentrated around 20–25°, with 15–30° as a practical starting range, while alternative weighting scenarios show directional shifts toward the prioritized objective.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiakai Song & Mingyu Zhang, 2026. "Interval-Based Design Rules for Fixed External Louvers in Glass Curtain Wall Office Buildings for Early-Stage Sustainable Design: A Case Study in Tianjin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-33, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4296-:d:1929118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4296-:d:1929118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.