Author
Listed:
- Nadia Lambiase
(Department of Cultures, Political and Society, Università di Torino, 10125 Turin, Italy)
- Roberto Di Monaco
(Department of Cultures, Political and Society, Università di Torino, 10125 Turin, Italy)
Abstract
In recent years, sustainability reporting has taken on an increasingly important role in corporate strategy discussions. Initially a voluntary tool, it has become a benchmark for measuring and communicating the environmental, social, and economic impacts of organizations in a structured way. In light of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), the research assumes that reporting is a lever for change and organizational innovation. To test the hypothesis, the authors chose to use what is known as a ‘natural experiment’: they observed the experience of a particular type of company, benefit corporations, which are required to publish an annual impact report. The empirical investigation was conducted using content analysis methodology to read the impact reports, websites, and social media channels of the companies, as well as case studies through semi-structured interviews. The findings of this study suggest that sustainability reporting can play a role that goes beyond transparency and compliance. In the cases analyzed, the preparation of the sustainability or impact report appears to function as an organizational coordination mechanism that mobilizes internal and external stakeholders. Through this process, companies progressively develop shared interpretations of sustainability objectives, experiment with measurement practices and introduce organizational changes affecting work organization, production processes and value-chain relationships.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4273-:d:1928489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.