IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4267-d1928252.html

Orientation-Driven Cooling Loads and Sustainability Metrics: Comparative Energy–Exergy–LCA Analysis of Hybrid Solar–Biomass sCO 2 Brayton–DORC Cycles for Residential Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Valencia

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Atlántico, Puerto Colombia 081007, Colombia)

  • José Manuel Tovar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad del Atlántico, Puerto Colombia 081007, Colombia)

  • César A. Isaza-Roldan

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

  • Luis Lalinde

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

  • J. W. Restrepo

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad EIA, Envigado 055428, Colombia)

Abstract

Renewable energy sources, such as solar and biomass, represent sustainable alternatives to meet the growing energy demands of the residential sector. This study evaluated the energy, exergy, and environmental performance of two Brayton configurations using supercritical carbon dioxide: a recompression cycle (SRC) and a recompression cycle with intercooling in the main compression (SMC), both coupled to a dual-loop organic Rankine cycle (DORC) and powered by a hybrid solar-biomass thermal system. Mass, energy, and exergy balances were developed, and a life cycle assessment was performed to quantify the environmental impact. The systems were designed to cover a cooling load of 130 kW corresponding to 200 dwellings constructed with Asbestos cement in the Colombian Caribbean region. The results show that both configurations meet the required demand; the SMC-DORC cycle operates at 650 °C, while the SRC-DORC requires 750 °C. The SRC-DORC exhibits higher thermal efficiency (53.24%), while the SMC-DORC achieves a slightly higher exergy efficiency (28.15%). Environmental analysis shows that the construction phase accounts for the majority of the total impact, exceeding 95% of emissions. Overall, both configurations are technically feasible, with the SRC-DORC standing out for its balance between efficiency and environmental impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Valencia & José Manuel Tovar & César A. Isaza-Roldan & Luis Lalinde & J. W. Restrepo, 2026. "Orientation-Driven Cooling Loads and Sustainability Metrics: Comparative Energy–Exergy–LCA Analysis of Hybrid Solar–Biomass sCO 2 Brayton–DORC Cycles for Residential Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-32, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4267-:d:1928252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4267/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4267/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4267-:d:1928252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.