Author
Listed:
- Cyma Adoracion Natividad
(Center for Structural Engineering and Informatics, MSU—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Lanao del Norte, Philippines
Research Institute for Engineering and Innovative Technology, MSU—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Lanao del Norte, Philippines)
- Joel Opon
(Center for Structural Engineering and Informatics, MSU—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Lanao del Norte, Philippines
Research Institute for Engineering and Innovative Technology, MSU—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Lanao del Norte, Philippines
Department of Civil Engineering and Technology, MSU—Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City 9200, Lanao del Norte, Philippines)
Abstract
Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) strongly influences health, comfort, and learning performance in academic buildings, yet assessment practices remain fragmented and rarely aligned with sustainability goals. This study conducted a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic literature review to identify, screen, and map IEQ indicators for educational facilities and to develop a sustainability-aligned framework for classroom evaluation. Searches of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010–2025) yielded 365 records; after de-duplication and eligibility screening, 142 peer-reviewed studies were included. From these, 118 unique IEQ indicators were extracted and classified into six domains: thermal comfort, indoor air quality, acoustic quality, visual comfort, environmental quality, and spatial quality. Using sustainability-oriented screening criteria (measurability, relevance, reliability, data accessibility, understandability, and long-term applicability), 50 indicators (42%) were retained as methodologically robust, while 68 (58%) were excluded due to weak standardization or limited practical applicability. The retained indicators were systematically mapped to the environmental, social, and economic pillars and aligned with key SDGs (3, 4, 7, 11, and 13). The resulting Sustainability-Aligned IEQ Indicator Framework integrates quality-screened indicators with pillar/SDG alignment and a mixed-method pathway that combines objective monitoring and occupant perception, supporting context-sensitive evaluation, particularly for naturally ventilated and tropical learning environments.
Suggested Citation
Cyma Adoracion Natividad & Joel Opon, 2026.
"Sustainability-Qualified IEQ Indicators for Academic Buildings: A Systematic Review (2010–2025) and SDG-Aligned Framework,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-30, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4260-:d:1928131
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4260-:d:1928131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.