Author
Listed:
- Gangyi Wang
(College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)
- Xing Zhang
(College of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China)
Abstract
Understanding the impact of rural digitalization on the resilience of the swine industry is crucial to promoting its transformation toward efficient and low-carbon production. However, existing research has not yet clarified how rural digitalization influences the resilience of the swine industry, and there is a particular lack of discussion regarding potential nonlinear relationships. Based on panel data from 30 Chinese provinces for the period 2011–2023, we employed the entropy method to measure the level of rural digitalization and the resilience of the swine industry. Two-way fixed-effects, mediation, and threshold models were adopted to empirically examine the relationship and underlying mechanisms. The findings indicated that rural digitalization significantly enhances the resilience of the swine industry, and this finding remained robust after multiple robustness checks and endogeneity treatments. This effect is primarily mediated by two pathways: industrial-scale expansion and industrial agglomeration. Additionally, well-designed environmental policies and higher rural household incomes can strengthen the beneficial effect of rural digitalization on industrial resilience. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the positive influence is stronger in regions with poor transportation infrastructure and in central and western China, where digitalization effectively strengthens the industry’s shock resistance and adaptive capacity. This study offers meaningful implications for policymakers seeking to accelerate rural digitalization and promote high-quality development of the swine industry in the digital age.
Suggested Citation
Gangyi Wang & Xing Zhang, 2026.
"How Does Rural Digitalization Affect the Resilience of the Swine Industry? A Sustainable Development Perspective,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-23, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4251-:d:1927905
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4251-:d:1927905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.