Author
Listed:
- Riccardo Fontana
(Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Luciano Vogli
(Punto 3 Srl S.B., 44122 Ferrara, Italy
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Mattia Buratto
(Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Elena Smiderle
(Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Noemi La Greca
(Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Chiara Nordi
(Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Martina Facchini
(Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Cesare Buffone
(Punto 3 Srl S.B., 44122 Ferrara, Italy)
- Peggy Marconi
(Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
LTTA Laboratory for Advanced Therapies, Technopole of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
CIB—Interuniversity Center for Biotechnologies, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
Abstract
The transition toward low-impact facility management requires robust evidence that environmental optimization does not compromise hygienic reliability. In the professional cleaning sector, sustainability claims are often based on product substitution rather than on integrated performance validation. This study provides a dual-perspective evaluation comparing a conventional cleaning protocol with the Pfe Green system, an eco-designed approach compliant with the Italian Minimum Environmental Criteria (CAM, D.M. 29 January 2021), implemented in a civil building of Renault Italia S.p.A. in Rome. A combined Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and microbiological evaluation was conducted under real operational conditions to quantify both climate-related and hygienic outcomes. The LCA, performed in accordance with ISO 14040–44 and ISO 14067 standards, demonstrated that the Green protocol achieved an approximately 30% reduction in Global Warming Potential over a 100-year horizon (GWP 100 ), mainly attributable to structural process optimization, including reduced detergent mass, lower laundering temperatures, improved dilution control, and energy-efficient machinery. Microbiological monitoring, conducted according to ISO 14698 and UNI EN ISO 18593, showed that both systems ensured high levels of microbial abatement, with the Green protocol exhibiting slightly higher average reductions in total viable counts (96.1% vs. 94.2%). These findings confirm that lower chemical input and eco-formulated products do not compromise hygienic performance when supported by standardized procedures and microfiber-based mechanical removal. By integrating life-cycle metrics with microbiological validation, this research proposes a replicable assessment model for sustainable cleaning services. The results demonstrate that CAM-aligned green protocols can simultaneously reduce greenhouse gas emissions and maintain hygienic effectiveness, thereby supporting evidence-based sustainable procurement and corporate environmental strategies. The originality of this study lies in the integration of life-cycle environmental assessment with real-world microbiological validation under operational conditions, providing a comprehensive framework for evaluating sustainable cleaning systems beyond product-level substitution.
Suggested Citation
Riccardo Fontana & Luciano Vogli & Mattia Buratto & Elena Smiderle & Noemi La Greca & Chiara Nordi & Martina Facchini & Cesare Buffone & Peggy Marconi, 2026.
"Life Cycle and Hygienic Evaluation of Green vs. Traditional Cleaning Protocols in Civil Buildings,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4250-:d:1927884
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4250-:d:1927884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.