Author
Listed:
- George Cristian
(Department of Overland Communication Ways, Foundations and Cadastral Survey, Politehnica University Timisoara, No. 2 Traian Lalescu Str., 300223 Timisoara, Romania)
- Sorin Herban
(Department of Overland Communication Ways, Foundations and Cadastral Survey, Politehnica University Timisoara, No. 2 Traian Lalescu Str., 300223 Timisoara, Romania)
- Clara-Beatrice Vîlceanu
(Department of Overland Communication Ways, Foundations and Cadastral Survey, Politehnica University Timisoara, No. 2 Traian Lalescu Str., 300223 Timisoara, Romania)
- Andreea-Diana Clepe
(Department of Overland Communication Ways, Foundations and Cadastral Survey, Politehnica University Timisoara, No. 2 Traian Lalescu Str., 300223 Timisoara, Romania)
- Carmen Grecea
(Department of Overland Communication Ways, Foundations and Cadastral Survey, Politehnica University Timisoara, No. 2 Traian Lalescu Str., 300223 Timisoara, Romania)
Abstract
This study presents a comparative evaluation of three modern surveying techniques—UAV photogrammetry, static tripod-based LiDAR scanning, and handheld mobile LiDAR—applied in the context of historic monument restoration. The focus is on analysing workflow efficiency, data accuracy, and adaptability to complex architectural features, including interior wall paintings, which are integral to the monument’s heritage value. Particular attention is given to how each technique captures surface texture, color fidelity, and material deterioration. The study also examines performance around intricate architectural elements such as vaulted ceilings, apses, cornices, columns, and carved stone portals, where occlusions, tight clearances, and fine ornamentation challenge coverage and resolution. By evaluating the strengths and limitations of each approach, the research highlights methodological considerations relevant for conservation professionals. The results indicate that the Static TLS is the most demanding workflow, requiring complex total station integration for control and station points. It produced the highest data density, with acquisition rates of one million points per second, making it the most hardware-intensive and difficult to manipulate. UAV photogrammetry provided a balanced middle-ground; it required minimal physical effort during acquisition and produced datasets that were significantly easier to manage. Handheld SLAM LiDAR emerged as the most productive solution for rapid coverage. While the handheld scanner’s image quality was lower than the photogrammetry, it still provided enough detail for the structural assessment and documentation needed. Although the point cloud lacked the extreme geometric detail provided by the TLS, the FARO Connect software made georeferencing and data manipulation significantly more efficient.
Suggested Citation
George Cristian & Sorin Herban & Clara-Beatrice Vîlceanu & Andreea-Diana Clepe & Carmen Grecea, 2026.
"Surveying Techniques for Built Heritage Conservation: A Comparative Perspective of Workflows for Monument Restoration,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4237-:d:1927596
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4237-:d:1927596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.