IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4228-d1927418.html

How Do Intrinsic Motivation and Green Self-Perception Affect Proactive Garbage Sorting Behavior? An Empirical Study from 31 Provinces in China

Author

Listed:
  • Gai Cao

    (School of Humanities and Social Science, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Key Laboratory of Behaivoral Science and Public Policy of Shaanxi Higher Education Institutions, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Rong Cao

    (School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Zhimin Du

    (School of Humanities and Social Science, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Key Laboratory of Behaivoral Science and Public Policy of Shaanxi Higher Education Institutions, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Zhuanzhi Tang

    (School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Zepeng Chen

    (School of Humanities and Social Science, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Key Laboratory of Behaivoral Science and Public Policy of Shaanxi Higher Education Institutions, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Shaopeng Che

    (School of Humanities and Social Science, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710064, China
    Key Laboratory of Behaivoral Science and Public Policy of Shaanxi Higher Education Institutions, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

In light of China’s mandatory garbage sorting policy, residents’ engagement in waste sorting tends to be short-term. To address this issue, this study proposes a conceptual framework to examine the relationships among motivation, green self-perception, and proactive garbage sorting behavior (PGSB). A total of 1550 questionnaires were collected across 31 provinces in China. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess measurement quality, and hierarchical regression combined with bootstrapping was employed to test the parallel mediating effects of green self-perception and its three dimensions (green self-identity, green self-efficacy, and green self-connection). The results indicate that both obligation-based and enjoyment-based intrinsic motivations are positively associated with PGSB and its sub-dimensions. Green self-perception shows a statistical indirect effect in the relationship between intrinsic motivation and behavior. Specifically, green self-identity and green self-efficacy serve as consistent and significant mediators across all behavioral outcomes. In contrast, the mediating role of green self-connection varies across behavioral types. For obligation-based motivation, it only acts as a significant negative mediator for constrained proactive garbage sorting, with no significant effect on other behaviors. For enjoyment-based motivation, it exerts a positive mediating effect on self-development PGSB but suppresses participatory and constrained PGSBs. These findings suggest that fostering green self-perception may be an important pathway associated with PGSB. The study provides policy-relevant insights for shifting residents from compliance-driven to more self-initiated participation in waste sorting.

Suggested Citation

  • Gai Cao & Rong Cao & Zhimin Du & Zhuanzhi Tang & Zepeng Chen & Shaopeng Che, 2026. "How Do Intrinsic Motivation and Green Self-Perception Affect Proactive Garbage Sorting Behavior? An Empirical Study from 31 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-31, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4228-:d:1927418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4228-:d:1927418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.