IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4227-d1927382.html

Assessing Accessibility and Public Acceptance of Hydrogen Refueling Stations in Seoul, South Korea: A Network-Based Location-Allocation Framework for Sustainable Urban Hydrogen Mobility

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Gyoon Kim

    (Disaster & Risk Management Laboratory, Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis & Disaster and Risk Management, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
    Disaster Management Research Center, The Seoul Institute, Seoul 06756, Republic of Korea)

  • Han-Saem Kim

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Dongguk University, Seoul 04620, Republic of Korea)

  • Jong-Seok Won

    (Disaster Management Research Center, The Seoul Institute, Seoul 06756, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Hydrogen refueling stations (HRSs) are a critical enabling infrastructure for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), yet their deployment in dense metropolitan areas often faces a dual challenge: limited travel-time accessibility for users and low public acceptance driven by perceived safety risks. This study develops an integrated, city-scale framework to quantify HRS accessibility and resident acceptance and to identify expansion priorities for Seoul, South Korea. We combine (i) an online perception survey of 1000 adult residents (October 2024) capturing environmental awareness, perceived safety, siting preferences, and willingness-to-travel distance; (ii) spatial demand data on FCEV registrations by administrative dong ( n = 2443 vehicles, 2022); and (iii) network-based travel-time analysis using the Seoul road network and the current HRS supply ( n = 10, 2024). Accessibility is evaluated under three travel-time thresholds (10, 15, and 20 min), with service-area delineation and demand-weighted underserved-area diagnosis. Candidate expansion sites are generated and screened using operational and regulatory constraints (e.g., site area and proximity to protected facilities), followed by a p-median location-allocation optimization to select five additional sites that minimize demand-weighted travel impedance. Results indicate that, under the 20 min threshold (7.7 km at an average operating speed of 23.1 km/h), 50 of 425 dongs (11.8%) and 244 of 2443 FCEVs (10.0%) are outside the baseline service coverage. After adding five sites (total n = 15), underserved dongs decrease to 5 (1.2%) and underserved FCEVs to 26 (1.1%) for the 20 min threshold, with consistent improvements across shorter thresholds. Survey responses further reveal that only 12.5% of respondents perceive HRSs as safe, while 46.5% report a maximum willingness-to-travel distance of up to 5 km, underscoring the need for both accessibility enhancement and risk-aware communication. The proposed workflow offers a transparent, reproducible approach to support equitable and risk-informed HRS planning by jointly considering network accessibility, demand distribution, and social acceptance, thereby contributing to sustainable urban mobility, low-carbon transport transition, and socially acceptable hydrogen infrastructure deployment. Beyond local accessibility improvement, the study is framed in the broader context of sustainability, as equitable and socially acceptable hydrogen refueling infrastructure can support low-carbon urban transport transitions and more resilient metropolitan energy-mobility systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Gyoon Kim & Han-Saem Kim & Jong-Seok Won, 2026. "Assessing Accessibility and Public Acceptance of Hydrogen Refueling Stations in Seoul, South Korea: A Network-Based Location-Allocation Framework for Sustainable Urban Hydrogen Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4227-:d:1927382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4227/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4227/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4227-:d:1927382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.