IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4180-d1926314.html

From Biological Baselines to Community Fisheries Agreements: A Participatory Model for Sustainable Amazonian Fisheries

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando Sánchez-Orellana

    (BIOMAS Research Group, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universidad de Las Americas, UDLAPark Campus, via Nayón, Quito 170124, Ecuador)

  • Rafael Yunda

    (World Wildlife Fund Ecuador, Av. La Coruña &, Quito 170517, Ecuador)

  • Jonathan Valdiviezo-Rivera

    (National Institute of Biodiversity, Pje. Rumipamba N. 341 and Av. de los Shyris (Parque La Carolina), Quito 170506, Ecuador)

  • Daysi Gualavisi-Cajas

    (BIOMAS Research Group, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universidad de Las Americas, UDLAPark Campus, via Nayón, Quito 170124, Ecuador)

  • Tarsicio Granizo

    (World Wildlife Fund Ecuador, Av. La Coruña &, Quito 170517, Ecuador)

  • Gabriela Echevarría

    (BIOMAS Research Group, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universidad de Las Americas, UDLAPark Campus, via Nayón, Quito 170124, Ecuador)

Abstract

Small-scale inland fisheries in the Amazon are critical for food security, yet their sustainability is increasingly threatened by overexploitation and environmental degradation. In data-limited contexts such as the northern Ecuadorian Amazon, the absence of continuous monitoring constrains the development of adaptive management strategies. This study develops an integrated socio-ecological baseline to support the establishment of fisheries agreements in five Indigenous communities of the Napo and Aguarico rivers. Through a participatory monitoring approach, we generated reproductive parameters (gonadosomatic index, fecundity, size at first maturity), population structure metrics, and length–weight relationships for key subsistence species across three hydrological phases. Reproductive investment exhibited marked seasonality, with peak gonadosomatic indices during rising waters in most species, identifying a critical period for protection. Life-history strategies ranged from high-fecundity periodic strategists to low-fecundity equilibrium species, implying differentiated vulnerability to harvesting. Community perceptions prioritized large migratory catfish and floodplain habitats, aligning with biological indicators of vulnerability. High performance in technical training demonstrated the feasibility of long-term local monitoring systems. By linking biological indicators with local ecological knowledge, this study proposes a pathway from baseline assessment to adaptive co-management. The framework presented here provides a transferable model for strengthening sustainability, governance, and food security in tropical small-scale fisheries facing persistent data limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando Sánchez-Orellana & Rafael Yunda & Jonathan Valdiviezo-Rivera & Daysi Gualavisi-Cajas & Tarsicio Granizo & Gabriela Echevarría, 2026. "From Biological Baselines to Community Fisheries Agreements: A Participatory Model for Sustainable Amazonian Fisheries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4180-:d:1926314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4180-:d:1926314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.