IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i9p4169-d1925992.html

Measuring and Assessing SDG-Related Indicators for Ecosystem Services Focused on Sustainable Agriculture: A Challenge for the Scientific Community

Author

Listed:
  • Johan Bouma

    (Independent Researcher, Formerly at Soil Science Department, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Sustainable development was documented in two Dutch case studies on arable farms acting as living labs, showing that methods are available to assess indicators and thresholds of ecosystem services in line with relevant Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Both farms met the various thresholds and thus obtained the lighthouse qualification, implying that these farmers can follow in the future their own type of successful management. The government, representing its citizens, should not prescribe farmers what to do but require them to reach the goals of sustainable development in their own professional way. Meeting the thresholds is the overall goal and that should also apply to various broadly defined farming systems emphasizing, for example, regenerative, organic, circular, nature-inclusive and high-tech-precision management. Current environmental regulations for agriculture in England and the Netherlands focus on payment for a variety of single management measures that have no quantitative relation with ecosystem services unless indicator measurements and assessments would be made. Questions are currently raised within the scientific community about the living lab concept and about methods and procedures to measure indicators and thresholds for ecosystem services. If the community cannot agree on an operational methodology soon, a scientifically sound expression for sustainable agriculture will remain beyond reach.

Suggested Citation

  • Johan Bouma, 2026. "Measuring and Assessing SDG-Related Indicators for Ecosystem Services Focused on Sustainable Agriculture: A Challenge for the Scientific Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4169-:d:1925992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/9/4169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4169-:d:1925992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.