Author
Listed:
- Aleksandra Mach
(Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)
- Daniel Wałach
(Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, AGH University of Krakow, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to identify the major environmental impact categories associated with geotechnical works, evaluate the adequacy of commonly used weighting methods, and highlight the need to adapt them to sector-specific characteristics and local conditions. Currently applied weighting approaches rely on standardized values that may not accurately reflect the environmental impact of activities across different economic sectors. Moreover, several impact categories, such as eutrophication, acidification, and water use, are strongly dependent on local conditions. The study included the identification of key environmental challenges across Europe and the development of maps illustrating their spatial distribution. Four weighting methods were applied and compared in terms of their influence on the ranking of assessed materials. The analysis shows that geotechnical works include Global Warming Potential, Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential, Particulate Matter, and Abiotic Depletion Potential—fossil. Adapting weightings to local conditions did not change the ranking of analyzed materials in Poland. However, it may significantly influence the results in regions facing different environmental challenges. The results may support the adaptation of environmental assessment methods in geotechnics and contribute to informed decision-making for sustainable development.
Suggested Citation
Aleksandra Mach & Daniel Wałach, 2026.
"Geotechnical Environmental Impact Assessment: Key Impact Categories, Weighting Methods, and Local Conditions,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-29, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4161-:d:1925812
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4161-:d:1925812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.