Author
Listed:
- Claudius Patrick Waran
(Department of Economics and Agrarian Development, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Av. Julius Nyerere, Maputo 257, Mozambique
Centre of Excellence in Agri-Food Systems and Nutrition (CE-AFSN), Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo 257, Mozambique
Department of Forestry, School of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Juba, University Street, Juba P.O. Box 82, South Sudan)
- Jaime Carlos Macuácua
(Department of Forestry Engineering, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Av. Julius Nyerere, Maputo 257, Mozambique)
- Nicia Giva
(Department of Economics and Agrarian Development, Faculty of Agronomy and Forestry Engineering, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Av. Julius Nyerere, Maputo 257, Mozambique)
Abstract
This study was designed to evaluate and explore the ecosystem-based adaptation practices for climate resilience with evidence from smallholder farmers’ perceptions of co-benefits and adoption decisions in Mabalane district, Mozambique. Ecosystem-based adaptation practice emerged as a sustainable approach to enhance rainfed smallholder farmers’ climate resilience while delivering multiple social, economic and environmental co-benefits. This study evaluated and explored the perceived co-benefits from adopting ecosystem-based adaptation practices and examined how they shape adoption decisions among the rainfed smallholder farmers. A mixed-method approach was employed, combining a household survey of 360 farm household heads, key informant interviews and focus group discussions. The main findings of the study revealed mixed cropping (83.9%), integrated crop-livestock (57.2%), and mulch tillage (51.1%) as the most adopted practices, as well as smallholder farmers perceiving multiple ecological and socio-economical co-benefits from adopting ecosystem-based adaptation practices. Although the study confirmed statistically significant relationships between ecosystem-based adaptation practices and the perceived co-benefits, none of the perceived co-benefits were significantly associated with an increase in the number of the adopted practices. Therefore, it is concluded that adoption decisions among smallholder farmers are not shaped by perceived ancillary benefits from ecosystem-based adaptation practices alone, but a combination of enabling conditions and resources endowments.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4150-:d:1925550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.