Author
Listed:
- Li-Shiue Gau
(Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan)
- Hsia Chu
(Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung 413, Taiwan)
- Jui-Chuan Huang
(Taichung Extinguishing Enterprise Co., Ltd., Taichung 414, Taiwan)
Abstract
This study examines how different dimensions of leisure literacy relate to work–leisure boundary management and work performance in digitally connected workplaces, addressing the problem that leisure may function as either a restorative resource or a source of boundary conflict. Drawing on boundary theory, the study adopts an exploratory case-based survey design using data from 75 employees in a Taiwanese fire safety enterprise, combining self-reports, supervisor evaluations, and organizational records, with findings analyzed through correlation, subgroup comparison, and regression-based analyses. The results indicate differentiated pathways: positive leisure attitude is associated with work–leisure balance and higher self-rated performance, whereas excessive leisure involvement is associated with increased boundary conflict. These performance-related patterns were more consistently observed for self-rated than for supervisor-rated performance, so performance implications should be interpreted with appropriate caution. Leisure knowledge shows a regulatory role primarily in reducing conflict rather than directly enhancing balance. The results further suggest that comparative leisure/work importance conditions these relationships: when work and leisure are valued more equally, leisure literacy relates more directly to performance, whereas under value imbalance, boundary management becomes more salient, linking leisure literacy to work outcomes. Family life-cycle differences were also observed, although these are treated as contextual. Overall, the study suggests that leisure literacy may support sustainable work performance by shaping whether leisure functions more as a resource or as a source of friction. By extending boundary theory to the work–leisure interface, the study highlights boundary regulation as a relevant issue for sustainable human resource management in digitally connected environments, particularly under conditions of blurred work–leisure boundaries.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:9:p:4147-:d:1925505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.