IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p4106-d1924506.html

Process Parameter Effects on the Environmental Performance of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Invar 36 Alloy: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Abate

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Giulio Mattera

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Samruddha Kokare

    (Sustainability Assessments of Materials and Circular Economy, Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven, Box 2450, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44, 3001 Leuven, Belgium
    Flanders Make@KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Luigi Nele

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

  • Guido Guizzi

    (Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy)

Abstract

This study quantitatively evaluates the impact of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process parameters on the environmental performance of components produced in Invar 36 alloy. An experimental campaign involving 49 parameter sets was carried out by varying wire feed speed, welding voltage, and welding speed. For each condition, electrical signals, shielding gas consumption, and wire usage were measured and converted into parameter-resolved Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data. A cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was implemented in SimaPro 9.6 using the European CML-IA baseline v3.10 midpoint method, adopting 1 kg of as-built deposited Invar 36 as the functional unit. Results show that feedstock production represents the dominant hotspot (8.68 kg CO 2 -eq/kg), while the WAAM stage contributes between 1.13 and 4.12 kg CO 2 -eq/kg, leading to a total impact ranging from 9.81 to 12.80 kg CO 2 -eq/kg. As a result, this study demonstrates that process parameter selection strongly influences environmental performance. Indeed, Specific Energy Consumption (SEC) ranges from 0.44 to 1.95 kWh/kg, while argon consumption varies between 0.26 and 1.51 kg/kg of deposited material. By analysing the results and excluding unstable or manufacturing-infeasible deposition regimes, the optimal trade-off between process stability and environmental impact is achieved at approximately WFS = 7 m/min, V = 20 V, and WS = 6.5 mm/s. Beyond quantifying the environmental hotspots of Invar 36 WAAM, this study provides a dedicated, parameter-resolved cradle-to-gate LCA based on experimentally measured foreground data collected across 49 process parameter combinations. By combining environmental assessment with feasibility screening of the investigated deposition regimes, the work identifies not only environmentally favourable conditions, but also parameter regions that are technologically viable for WAAM processing of Invar 36. The resulting dataset provides a benchmark foundation for future sustainability-oriented process optimisation and decision support in WAAM.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Abate & Giulio Mattera & Samruddha Kokare & Luigi Nele & Guido Guizzi, 2026. "Process Parameter Effects on the Environmental Performance of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Invar 36 Alloy: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4106-:d:1924506
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4106/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4106/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4106-:d:1924506. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.