IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p4102-d1924487.html

Estimating Households’ Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Waste Treatment Service in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Van Quy Khuc

    (Faculty of Development Economics, VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Ngoc Duc Doan

    (SCDM Lab, VietKAP, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Thuy Nguyen

    (SCDM Lab, VietKAP, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Thi Vinh Ha Nguyen

    (Faculty of Development Economics, VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Thi Mai Huong

    (Faculty of Development Economics, VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Duc Lam

    (Faculty of Political Economy, VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Thi Quynh Trang Tran

    (Faculty of International Business and Economics, VNU University of Economics and Business, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

  • Thi Nguyet Nuong Nguyen

    (Faculty of Business Administration, East Asia University of Technology, Trinh Van Bo Road, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam)

Abstract

Waste pollution is becoming a major health issue in many developing nations. Waste-reduction options have been investigated and proposed, but environmental culture-based initiatives have not. This study explores and advances Vietnamese families’ environmental culture related to waste management, using the Culture Tower framework and a contingent valuation method coupled with a Bayesian model (CVBM). Specifically, descriptive statistics measure environmental literacy, while CVBM determines household willingness-to-pay (WTP) and estimates WTP for waste treatment services (WTP4WTS). Based on our survey of 487 households across 11 communes and wards in Hai Phong City, local waste pollution has decreased over time, although the respondents remain concerned. Over 13% of households were dissatisfied with waste treatment services (WTSs), while approximately 50% were neutral. Most respondents (79.26%) were willing to pay for improved WTSs, with an average WTP of 60,200 VND (US$2.32) per household per month. Behavioral and perceptual factors, such as the desire for improved waste services, current perceived waste pollution, and the perception that pollution has worsened, were found to significantly influence this willingness. Our study makes three major contributions. First, it develops a novel CVBM framework that links environmental culture and an economic valuation method, strengthening green economy micro-behavioral research. Second, it advances the circular economy literature by highlighting household engagement and willingness-to-pay as key drivers of sustainable waste financing and resource-loop closure. Third, it provides empirical evidence to inform and refine Vietnam’s revised Law on Environmental Protection (2020), particularly in implementing the “polluter pays” principle, promoting waste classification at the source, and designing socially acceptable environmental financing mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Quy Khuc & Ngoc Duc Doan & Thuy Nguyen & Thi Vinh Ha Nguyen & Nguyen Thi Mai Huong & Nguyen Duc Lam & Thi Quynh Trang Tran & Thi Nguyet Nuong Nguyen, 2026. "Estimating Households’ Willingness-to-Pay for Improved Waste Treatment Service in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4102-:d:1924487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4102/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4102/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4102-:d:1924487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.