IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p4101-d1924466.html

Quantifying National Energy Policy Performance for SDG 7: Evidence from Türkiye Using a SWARA–TOPSIS Approach (2014–2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Nazli Tekman Ordu

    (Department of Transportation Services, Osmaniye Vocational School, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, 80010 Osmaniye, Türkiye)

  • Demet Donmez

    (Department of Public Administration and Political Science, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, 80010 Osmaniye, Türkiye)

  • Muhammed Ordu

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, 80010 Osmaniye, Türkiye)

  • Mehmet Burhanettin Coskun

    (Department of Public Administration and Political Science, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, 80010 Osmaniye, Türkiye)

Abstract

Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG 7) aims to ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all. Evaluating the effectiveness of national energy policies in achieving this goal requires comprehensive and quantitative assessment frameworks. Countries’ performance toward SDG 7 is influenced by various structural factors, including energy demand growth, dependency on energy imports, renewable energy potential, and policy priorities. Therefore, systematic performance evaluation is essential for understanding policy effectiveness and identifying areas requiring improvement. This study evaluates Türkiye’s SDG 7 energy policy performance on a yearly basis over the period 2014–2023. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework combining the Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods is employed to quantify and compare performance across years. The proposed approach allows for the determination of indicator weights and the ranking of yearly performance levels based on multiple energy sustainability criteria. The results reveal an overall upward trend in Türkiye’s SDG 7 performance during the study period, although notable fluctuations are observed. A significant decline occurs in 2017, followed by a rapid recovery in subsequent years. Another temporary downturn is identified in 2021, while a remarkable improvement emerges in 2023. A sensitivity analysis based on multiple weighting scenarios was also conducted to examine the robustness of the obtained rankings, and the results confirm the stability of the overall ranking structure, with 2023 consistently maintaining the top position across most scenarios. These findings provide insights into how policy measures, market dynamics, and energy system developments influence the country’s progress toward sustainable energy goals. By incorporating a time-based evaluation framework, this study contributes to the SDG 7 literature by offering a quantitative and policy-oriented assessment of national energy performance. The proposed framework also provides a practical analytical tool for policymakers and energy regulators to monitor progress, identify vulnerable areas, and support evidence-based decision-making in the transition toward sustainable and clean energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Nazli Tekman Ordu & Demet Donmez & Muhammed Ordu & Mehmet Burhanettin Coskun, 2026. "Quantifying National Energy Policy Performance for SDG 7: Evidence from Türkiye Using a SWARA–TOPSIS Approach (2014–2023)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4101-:d:1924466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4101-:d:1924466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.