Author
Listed:
- Naycari Forfora
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Rhonald Ortega
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Isabel Urdaneta
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Ivana Azuaje
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Ryen Frazier
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Mariana Lendewig
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Hasan Jameel
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Richard A. Venditti
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
- Michael Hummel
(Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, Finland)
- Ronalds Gonzalez
(Department of Forest Biomaterials, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8005, USA)
Abstract
This study presents the first cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) of T-shirt production using viscose and Lyocell fibers, benchmarked against cotton and polyester under consistent system boundaries. The analysis covers spinning, knitting, wet processing, garment assembly, and regionalized energy supply. Results show that cotton T-shirts exhibit the lowest global warming potential (14.1 kg CO 2 eq/kg) but the highest water demand (2.9 m 3 /kg) in China. Polyester garments, although less water-intensive, contribute significantly to plastic accumulation (1.0 kg/kg shirt) compared to cellulose-based fibers (0.1 kg/kg shirt). Within man-made cellulose fibers, Lyocell generally outperforms viscose in toxicity-related categories—reducing freshwater ecotoxicity by 35% and human non-carcinogenic toxicity by 62%—thanks to its closed-loop solvent recovery. However, Lyocell also shows the highest carbon footprint (21.6 kg CO 2 eq/kg) unless produced in regions with cleaner energy mixes. Regional sensitivity analysis indicates that shifting production from China to Brazil could reduce global warming impacts by up to 38%. Overall, these results highlight the trade-offs across fiber types and demonstrate the importance of both material choice and production geography in driving sustainability within textile supply chains.
Suggested Citation
Naycari Forfora & Rhonald Ortega & Isabel Urdaneta & Ivana Azuaje & Ryen Frazier & Mariana Lendewig & Hasan Jameel & Richard A. Venditti & Michael Hummel & Ronalds Gonzalez, 2026.
"A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of T-Shirt Production Using from Viscose, Lyocell, Cotton, and Polyester,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4070-:d:1923862
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4070-:d:1923862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.