IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p4059-d1923643.html

A Study of Circular Economy Practices in KSA’s Small and Medium Industries: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Potential

Author

Listed:
  • Houcine Benlaria

    (College of Business, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Naeimah Fahad S. Almawishir

    (College of Business, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hisham Mohamed Misbah

    (College of Business, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Tarig Osman Abdallah Helal

    (College of Business, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Taha Khairy Taha Ibrahim

    (College of Business, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ahmed Benlaria

    (Faculty of Economics, Commerce and Management Sciences, Ahmed Draia University of Adrar, Adrar 01000, Algeria)

  • Mohamed Djafar Henni

    (College of Business, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rania Alaa Eldin Ahmed Khedr

    (School of Business and Economics, Badr University in Cairo—BUC, Cairo 11829, Egypt)

Abstract

The circular economy (CE) can help businesses use resources more efficiently, but empirical evidence on CE adoption among non-European SMEs remains limited. This study examines CE practices, benefits, challenges, and future intentions in 220 Saudi Arabian SMIs. A structured survey collected data on four CE practice domains (resource efficiency, waste management, eco-design, and reverse logistics), four benefit dimensions (economic, environmental, operational, and reputational), four challenge dimensions (financial, organizational, technical, and regulatory), and six future intention items. CE adoption was moderate (M = 3.29 on a five-point scale) and balanced across all four practice domains, with resource efficiency scoring highest (M = 3.32). Benefit scores averaged 3.46, far outpacing challenges (M = 2.78). This benefit surplus of 0.68 points (on a five-point scale) indicates that Saudi SMIs perceive CE as worthwhile and view its barriers as manageable rather than prohibitive. Together, perceived benefits and perceived challenges explained 54.3% of the variance in CE adoption (R 2 = 0.543) in multiple regression analysis. Reducing perceived challenges may be a more effective lever for promoting CE adoption than amplifying perceived benefits, as challenges exerted a larger absolute standardised effect (β = −0.50) than perceived benefits (β = 0.39). Once perceptions were controlled, perceived benefits and challenges significantly predicted future CE intentions, but current CE practices did not. According to the Theory of Planned Behavior’s attitudinal pathway, firms without CE experience can develop strong forward-looking intentions if the business case is convincing and barriers are perceived as manageable. Technical and organizational barriers outweighed financial ones, indicating the need for capacity-building interventions over supplementary financing, unlike European findings. About 79% of respondents were neutral or positive about government-supported CE expansion. CE adoption did not differ significantly by firm size, geographic location, or ownership structure, suggesting that Vision 2030’s sustainability messaging has established a broad baseline of CE awareness across Saudi SMIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Houcine Benlaria & Naeimah Fahad S. Almawishir & Hisham Mohamed Misbah & Tarig Osman Abdallah Helal & Taha Khairy Taha Ibrahim & Ahmed Benlaria & Mohamed Djafar Henni & Rania Alaa Eldin Ahmed Khedr, 2026. "A Study of Circular Economy Practices in KSA’s Small and Medium Industries: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-30, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4059-:d:1923643
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4059-:d:1923643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.