Author
Listed:
- Loqman Ahmadi
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA)
- Vassiliki Demetracopoulou
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA)
- Ali Maher
(Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA)
Abstract
Transportation asset management (TAM) has traditionally centered on technical performance and economic efficiency. In recent years, however, there has been increasing recognition of the environmental and social impacts of maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) activities. This paper presents a systematic review of how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics are being incorporated into TAM. Using PRISMA 2020, four major databases were searched, identifying 75 studies since 2010. Environmental metrics were the most developed, especially those measuring emissions, energy use, and material consumption. Social metrics appeared less frequently and are typically used descriptively, including indicators of income inequality, user costs, and equity-focused metrics such as the Benefit Distribution Ratio and Social Return on Investment. Governance was the least explored pillar and is generally addressed through fiscal transparency, risk management, or institutional practices rather than explicit measurable indicators. Overall, the review shows growing interest in integrating ESG into TAM, but the adoption of social and governance metrics remains limited. In particular, governance indicators are rarely operationalized as measurable variables within TAM decision-making, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. This study synthesizes ESG-related indicators used in TAM and provides a structured foundation for future research and more comprehensive sustainability-oriented decision frameworks.
Suggested Citation
Loqman Ahmadi & Vassiliki Demetracopoulou & Ali Maher, 2026.
"Quantifying Sustainability in Transportation Asset Management: A Review of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Metrics,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-25, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4051-:d:1923523
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4051-:d:1923523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.