Author
Listed:
- Arūnas Žiedelis
(Centre for Organisational Psychology Research, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė
(Centre for Organisational Psychology Research, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Ieva Urbanavičiūtė
(Centre for Organisational Psychology Research, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Rita Jakštienė
(Centre for Organisational Psychology Research, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)
- Justė Margevičienė
(Centre for Organisational Psychology Research, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)
Abstract
As work–life balance (WLB) is considered the main premise of a sustainable workforce, organizations and policymakers direct their efforts toward helping employees attain it. However, there is a lack of research on organizational efforts to sustain WLB across different work arrangements. This study, therefore, explores the relationships among WLB culture, boundary control, and WLB among teleworkers and on-site workers. A two-wave survey with a six-month time lag involved 379 white-collar employees from various industries. The results showed that WLB culture was associated with greater boundary control over time. Moreover, this effect was significant only among office workers but not among teleworkers, suggesting that WLB culture is more important when working on site. Additionally, greater boundary control was related to a higher affective dimension of WLB, but not with the effectiveness dimension, six months later. Practical and empirical implications for organizational practices that enhance work–life balance across various settings are discussed.
Suggested Citation
Arūnas Žiedelis & Jurgita Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė & Ieva Urbanavičiūtė & Rita Jakštienė & Justė Margevičienė, 2026.
"Work-Life Balance Culture, Boundary Control, and Work-Life Balance in Sustainable Future Work: Longitudinal Evidence from On-Site and Remote Work Arrangements,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-17, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4039-:d:1923384
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4039-:d:1923384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.