Author
Listed:
- Changxing Li
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China)
- Yihui Shang
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China)
- Tian Li
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China)
- Shuqi Liu
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China)
- Lingxiang Wei
(School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Shandong Jiaotong University, Jinan 250357, China)
- Junfeng An
(Jinan Railway Transportation Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250000, China)
Abstract
Time headway is a key parameter for describing car-following behavior and microscopic traffic flow characteristics, and it is important for traffic safety analysis, road design, and optimizing intelligent-driving strategies. Existing research offers limited insight into the heterogeneity of time headway under different vehicle types and lane conditions. It is particularly important to investigate how time headway distributions differ across lane–vehicle-type combinations on highways, as these differences can affect safety evaluation and operational performance. This study is based on drone-captured vehicle trajectories from the publicly available HighD dataset. We select 378,751 vehicle–frame trajectory records; these records are used to construct valid follower–leader pairs and derive time headway (THW) samples for distribution fitting. Eight subsets are formed by combining two lane positions (inner vs. outer) and four follower–leader vehicle-type pairs (car–car, car–truck, truck–car, truck–truck). Six candidate distributions (Lognormal, Log-logistic, Burr, Weibull, Gamma, and Logistic) are fitted using maximum likelihood estimation, and their fit is evaluated using Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Anderson–Darling, and Chi-square tests, which are fused via an entropy-weighted composite score for model ranking. Results show pronounced heterogeneity across lane–vehicle-type subsets: Inner-lane samples exhibit smaller and more concentrated time gaps, whereas outer-lane samples show larger mean gaps, stronger dispersion, and heavier upper tails. Overall, Lognormal(3P) is selected as the top-ranked model in 5 of 8 subsets (62.5%), while Burr(4P) (car–truck, outer lane), Gamma(3P) (truck–car, outer lane), and Weibull(3P) (truck–truck, inner lane) are optimal in the remaining subsets. These findings indicate that lane position and vehicle-type pairing materially affect THW distributional characteristics, providing quantitative guidance for lane- and vehicle-aware traffic modeling, safety-oriented assessment, and intelligent-driving strategy design.
Suggested Citation
Changxing Li & Yihui Shang & Tian Li & Shuqi Liu & Lingxiang Wei & Junfeng An, 2026.
"Modeling Headway Distribution by Lane and Vehicle Type for Expressways Using UAV Data,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-32, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4003-:d:1922377
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4003-:d:1922377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.