IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p4000-d1922457.html

Defects in Modular Building Construction: A Systematic Lifecycle Review and Implications for Sustainable Delivery

Author

Listed:
  • Argaw Gurmu

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Fatemeh Fallah Tafti

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • Anthony Mills

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

  • John Kite

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong 3220, Australia)

Abstract

Despite its potential to enhance construction quality, efficiency, and sustainability, modular construction continues to experience defects that hinder its broader adoption. Understanding and mitigating defects is essential for maximising the sustainability benefits of modular construction by reducing material waste, minimising rework and improving lifecycle performance. Existing research remains fragmented, with limited synthesis integrating defects with their root causes across the project lifecycle. To address this gap, this study investigates defect types, lifecycle-based causes, and mitigation strategies in modular building projects through a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review of 61 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2015 and 2025 and retrieved from Scopus and Web of Science. Six major defect categories were identified: geometric and dimensional; material and component; joint and connection integrity; envelope performance and durability; structural; and mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) defects, with geometric and dimensional defects emerging as the most prevalent, accounting for 26.7% of reported cases. Lifecycle root-cause mapping indicates that poor workmanship during on-site assembly is the dominant contributor, accounting for 44.1% of identified root causes, with manufacturing errors (26.8%) and design limitations (13.4%) acting as critical upstream sources. Mitigation strategies cluster into three groups: general recommendations (39% of reported strategies), mainly focusing on low-cost organisational measures such as logistics coordination and workforce training; structured risk-management frameworks (9.1%), including assembly sequencing and tolerance planning; and digital and data-driven technologies (51.9%), such as laser scanning, AI-based inspection, and digital twins, enabling proactive quality assurance across the lifecycle. The study proposes an integrated lifecycle–defect–mitigation framework to strengthen quality governance and advance sustainable modular delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Argaw Gurmu & Fatemeh Fallah Tafti & Anthony Mills & John Kite, 2026. "Defects in Modular Building Construction: A Systematic Lifecycle Review and Implications for Sustainable Delivery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4000-:d:1922457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4000/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/4000/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:4000-:d:1922457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.