IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3965-d1921615.html

A Four-Dimensional Governance Framework for Hydrogen Energy Policy: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of G20 Nations

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Wang

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Baomin Wang

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

Hydrogen energy has emerged as a strategic pathway for decarbonization, industrial transformation, and energy security across major economies. This study does not directly evaluate ex post policy outcomes. Instead, it develops a Four-Dimensional Governance Framework to assess the structural effectiveness and implementation-oriented capacity embedded within national hydrogen policy frameworks. The analysis examines G20 countries through four dimensions, namely policy objectives, policy intensity, policy tools, and policy subjects. Using the entropy weighted TOPSIS method, the study compares the relative coherence of hydrogen governance architectures across countries. The results show that countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada and Japan consistently rank among the leading group in the comparative evaluation, while other countries occupy intermediate or lower positions according to the composite index results. Policy subjects and policy objectives receive relatively higher weights in the empirical analysis, indicating their stronger contribution to cross-national differentiation within the constructed index. The study provides a structured basis for comparing hydrogen governance frameworks and offers a replicable method for future research linking policy design to implementation evidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Wang & Baomin Wang, 2026. "A Four-Dimensional Governance Framework for Hydrogen Energy Policy: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of G20 Nations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-37, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3965-:d:1921615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3965/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3965/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3965-:d:1921615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.