Author
Listed:
- Bassam Mohammad Maali
(Department of International Accounting, German Jordanian University (GJU), Amman 11180, Jordan)
- Loay Salhieh
(Department of Logistics Sciences, German Jordanian University (GJU), Amman 11180, Jordan)
- Khaldoun K. Tahboub
(Department of Logistics Sciences, German Jordanian University (GJU), Amman 11180, Jordan)
Abstract
Purchasing portfolio models, particularly the Kraljic matrix, are widely used to support sourcing decisions under supply risk. Yet, they are often criticized for relying on subjective assessments and focusing mainly on upstream uncertainty while neglecting downstream demand volatility. This study develops a quantitatively grounded purchasing portfolio framework that integrates demand volatility and lead-time volatility into a unified measure of supply risk to support more sustainable sourcing decisions. Using transactional data for 876 stock-keeping units (SKUs) from a pharmaceutical distribution company, demand and lead-time volatility are measured through coefficients of variation and combined using an adjusted multifactor model that accounts for their interdependence. Financial importance is measured objectively through gross profit and classified according to the 80–20 Pareto principle. These metrics are incorporated into a revised purchasing portfolio matrix that classifies items into strategic, leverage, bottleneck, and routine categories. The findings reveal substantial variation in combined volatility across SKUs and show that incorporating demand uncertainty significantly changes portfolio positioning compared with traditional approaches. By linking purchasing and marketing perspectives, the proposed model reduces subjectivity, improves risk visibility, and supports sustainable sourcing and inventory decisions in volatile environments.
Suggested Citation
Bassam Mohammad Maali & Loay Salhieh & Khaldoun K. Tahboub, 2026.
"Integrating Demand/Lead-Time Volatility into a Sustainable Purchasing Portfolio Matrix: A Conceptual Matrix Framework and Empirical Case Study,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3957-:d:1921463
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3957-:d:1921463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.