Author
Listed:
- Carlos Ruiz-Díaz
(Department of Graphic Engineering and Geomatics, Campus de Rabanales, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain)
- Paula Triviño-Tarradas
(Department of Graphic Engineering and Geomatics, Campus de Rabanales, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain)
- Guillermo Guerrero-Vacas
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus de Rabanales, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain)
- Óscar Rodríguez-Alabanda
(Department of Mechanical Engineering, Campus de Rabanales, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain)
- Pedro Medina-Triviño
(Department of Applied Physics, Radiology and Physical Medicine, Campus de Rabanales, University of Cordoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain)
- María M. Serrano-Baena
(Department of Graphic Engineering and Geomatics, Campus de Rabanales, University of Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain)
Abstract
As natural and anthropogenic hazards intensify, improving the performance of reinforced-concrete (RC) infrastructure within a resilience-oriented assessment framework while limiting environmental burdens has become an important challenge for sustainable construction. In this context, this study proposes an OpenBIM-based digital-twin methodology to compare two equivalent RC structural scenarios: a conventional solution and an alternative incorporating unprocessed waste sheep wool fibres into cementitious materials. Using an IFC-based model of a high-rise building, the workflow enables automated extraction of structural quantities and a consistent building-scale assessment of material use, environmental impacts, and circularity indicators. Laboratory evidence from the literature is translated into element-level performance criteria through a dual-factor selection strategy based on key structural properties and secondary indicators related to cracking and post-cracking behaviour. The results show that the wool-fibre alternative enables the incorporation of a relevant amount of waste wool into the structure while causing only negligible increases in embodied energy and carbon emissions relative to the conventional RC scenario. The selected formulations also maintain or improve the governing mechanical and serviceability-related factors, indicating potential benefits in crack control, toughness, and repairability. Overall, this methodology provides a reproducible pathway for linking laboratory-scale material innovation with building-scale digital assessment, supporting more sustainable and performance-aware decision-making in RC construction.
Suggested Citation
Carlos Ruiz-Díaz & Paula Triviño-Tarradas & Guillermo Guerrero-Vacas & Óscar Rodríguez-Alabanda & Pedro Medina-Triviño & María M. Serrano-Baena, 2026.
"From Laboratory to Building Scale: A Digital-Twin Methodology for Resilience-Oriented Assessment of RC Infrastructure Using Waste Wool-Fibre Cementitious Materials,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3942-:d:1921220
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3942-:d:1921220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.