IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3941-d1921162.html

Multidimensional Evaluation and Synergistic Development Strategies for Regional Carbon Neutrality: An Analysis of China’s Provincial Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Dazhi Linghu

    (School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    College of Business, Nanning University, Nanning 530004, China
    Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Science of Statistics and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Rui Meng

    (School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Science of Statistics and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Haicang Yan

    (School of Business, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Key Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Science of Statistics and Management, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Xinli Wu

    (School of Business Administration, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China)

  • Li Li

    (College of Business, Nanning University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

As the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals advance rapidly, grasping the development status and differences in carbon neutrality across China’s provincial regions is crucial for interpreting the regional collaborative governance pattern under the circular economy initiative and promoting responsible production and consumption transformation. This paper constructs a research framework for the comprehensive evaluation and collaborative strategy of carbon neutrality. Using the Entropy Weight-TOPSIS, K-means clustering, and obstacle factor diagnosis models, the development status of carbon neutrality in 30 Chinese provinces is revealed from the perspectives of green economy, green politics, green culture, green society, and green ecology. Regional differences and critical obstacle factors are identified. Guided by the “Five-sphere Integrated Plan,” this study refines the carbon neutrality evaluation framework and fills an existing gap in the literature regarding the diagnosis of heterogeneous obstacles. It provides empirical evidence for the coordinated advancement of carbon neutrality. We find that (1) China’s overall carbon neutrality capability is relatively weak, showing a spatial pattern of “high in the east and low in the west” and a Matthew effect of “the strong getting stronger and the weak getting weaker.” The development levels of the subsystems vary markedly, with excellent and underperforming subsystems coexisting across different provinces. (2) The 30 provinces are classified as comprehensive leading, balanced-developing, policy-economy dual-driven, ecology-driven, and potential-oriented. (3) Overall, the key obstacle factors are low-carbon transportation, technology, and philosophy, yet these factors vary across the groups. To foster collaborative carbon neutrality promotion, policies should be implemented in the future based on different characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Dazhi Linghu & Rui Meng & Haicang Yan & Xinli Wu & Li Li, 2026. "Multidimensional Evaluation and Synergistic Development Strategies for Regional Carbon Neutrality: An Analysis of China’s Provincial Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3941-:d:1921162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3941/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3941/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3941-:d:1921162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.