IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3921-d1920778.html

Digital Government and SDG 9 in the European Union: Institutional Saturation, Digital Co-Investment, and the EU15/EU13 Divide

Author

Listed:
  • Oksana Liashenko

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 43025 Lutsk, Ukraine
    Loughborough Business School, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, West Ukrainian National University, 46020 Ternopil, Ukraine
    Institute of Public Administration and Business, WSEI University, 20-209 Lublin, Poland)

  • Olena Mykhailovska

    (Research and Educational Innovation Centre of Social Transformations, 14032 Chernihiv, Ukraine)

  • Dariusz Woźniak

    (School of Business, National-Louis University, 33-300 Nowy Sącz, Poland)

  • Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed

    (Institute of Public Administration and Business, WSEI University, 20-209 Lublin, Poland)

  • Ihor Ruzhytskyi

    (Private Postgraduate Educational Institution “Institute of Professional Transformations”, 02095 Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Digital government is widely regarded as a catalyst for sustainable development, yet the mechanisms by which e-government adoption translates into progress on the SDGs remain poorly understood, particularly in high-income contexts where governance is already mature. This study addresses that gap using a balanced panel of all 27 EU member states over 2015–2023. Applying two-way fixed-effects estimation with formal Baron–Kenny mediation and country-block bootstrap inference, we identify three findings that collectively reframe the relationship between digital government and sustainable development in the European context. First, the widely assumed governance reform pathway is not empirically supported in the EU27: e-government adoption is not associated with measurable improvement in institutional quality, consistent with structural saturation rather than policy failure. Second, the benefits of digital government are unevenly distributed across the EU: old member states (EU15) exhibit significant positive effects on SDG 9: Innovation and Infrastructure, whereas new member states (EU13) do not, challenging the assumption that digital strategies yield symmetric returns across the Union. Third, and most importantly, the EU15 effect appears to be fully channelled through household internet access, consistent with a digital co-investment mechanism in which e-government uptake and broadband infrastructure co-evolve as expressions of a shared national digital transformation strategy. These findings inform the policy debate: the question for EU15 is not whether to invest in e-government, but how to sustain the joint infrastructure investment that makes it effective; for EU13, the priority is to establish the digital and institutional foundations that enable the mechanism to be activated.

Suggested Citation

  • Oksana Liashenko & Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi & Olena Mykhailovska & Dariusz Woźniak & Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed & Ihor Ruzhytskyi, 2026. "Digital Government and SDG 9 in the European Union: Institutional Saturation, Digital Co-Investment, and the EU15/EU13 Divide," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-34, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3921-:d:1920778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3921/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3921/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3921-:d:1920778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.