IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3892-d1920288.html

Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Based on the Markov-FLUS Model: A Case Study of the Hexi Corridor

Author

Listed:
  • Zaijie Zhang

    (Green Development Strategy Research Institute, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

  • Xiaoxiao Song

    (School of Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China)

Abstract

As a major ecological safeguard in northwestern China and an important corridor for the Belt and Road Initiative, the Hexi Corridor holds strategic significance for improving landscape structure and enhancing regional ecological security. Focusing on the Hexi Corridor, this study develops a landscape ecological risk (LER) index based on land use (LU) data from 2000, 2010, and 2020. The study employs ArcGIS spatial analysis and XGBoost-SHAP, an interpretable machine learning method, to analyze the spatiotemporal evolution of LU and LERs, as well as their driving factors. Furthermore, the Markov-FLUS model is utilized to simulate and predict LU and LER spatial patterns under multiple scenarios for 2030. The results show that: (1) The dominant land type in the Hexi Corridor is unused land, accounting for 67.33%. During the research period, the extents of unused land, grassland, and forestland showed a steady decline, while built-up land and cropland increased. (2) LERs are categorized into five types, with high risk being the most prevalent, accounting for 52.02%. Between 2000 and 2020, the total area of higher and high risks decreased by 4312 km 2 , indicating an overall decrease in LER across the region. (3) LER is primarily influenced by annual rainfall, population density, distance to main roads, and distance to rivers. (4) Marked variations in LU patterns and LER are observed across different development scenarios projected for 2030.

Suggested Citation

  • Zaijie Zhang & Xiaoxiao Song, 2026. "Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment and Multi-Scenario Simulation of Land Use Based on the Markov-FLUS Model: A Case Study of the Hexi Corridor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3892-:d:1920288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3892/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3892/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3892-:d:1920288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.