Author
Listed:
- Runhua Huang
(Business Technology Innovation and Development Research Center (Hangzhou), Zhejiang Business College, Hangzhou 310053, China
School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518172, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Feng Shi
(School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518172, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Huichao Guo
(Business Technology Innovation and Development Research Center (Hangzhou), Zhejiang Business College, Hangzhou 310053, China
School of Emergency Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China)
Abstract
As China transitions from rapid urbanization to high-quality development, the competition for population among cities has intensified, characterized by a shift from labor-intensive migration to multi-dimensional lifestyle choices. However, traditional migration models often assume global linearity, failing to capture the complex non-linear thresholds and spatial non-stationarity inherent in migration decisions. This study employs a novel Geographically Weighted Random Forest (GWRF) model to analyze net migration flows across 278 Chinese cities using high-granularity mobile signaling data from the 2020 Spring Festival travel rush. The results reveal that GWRF significantly outperforms traditional OLS, GWR, and global Random Forest models, effectively handling spatial heterogeneity and non-linearity. Wage levels are the dominant global driver, exhibiting a distinct “S-curve” non-linear threshold, while population scale shows a significant U-shaped effect, highlighting the transition from agglomeration economies to congestion costs. Migration drivers exhibit profound spatial heterogeneity: western inland cities are “wage-driven,” the Pearl River Delta is “employment-structure driven,” and the northeastern “Rust Belt” is increasingly sensitive to “innovation investment” (technology expenditure). These findings challenge the “one-size-fits-all” approach to population policy, offering precise, spatially targeted strategies for urban planners to mitigate population shrinkage and enhance urban vitality.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3866-:d:1919795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.