IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3797-d1918182.html

Tourism Ecological Security of Cultural Landscape Heritage: Dynamic Assessment and Prediction Using an Improved DPSIR-TOPSIS-RBF Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Shuang Du

    (School of Urban Construction and Ecological Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China
    Center for Historical Geographical Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Zhengji Yang

    (School of Urban Construction and Ecological Technology, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China)

  • Xiaoli Li

    (College of Landscape and Horticulture, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global sustainable development and ecological civilization construction, tourism ecological security at cultural landscape heritage sites faces both opportunities and challenges. This study constructs a cultural landscape heritage tourism ecological security (CLHTES) evaluation system based on the Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework. It dynamically assesses CLHTES in the Yangtze River Delta Integrated Demonstration Zone (YRDIDZ) from 2014 to 2023 using the entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and linear stretching transformation, identifies obstacle factors with the obstacle degree model, and predicts CLHTES trends for 2024–2030 using a radial basis function (RBF) neural network. Results show that: (1) The CLHTES index in the YRDIDZ presented a three-stage fluctuating upward trend during 2014–2023, with medium-clustered security levels and divergent evolution across the DPSIR criteria layers; (2) CLHTES obstacles feature a multi-level differentiated structure, with rising barriers in D and P layers, the R layer as the future core obstacle, and high-frequency barriers concentrated in cultural and social indicators; (3) Under the assumption of structural continuity in current trajectories, the conditional trend projection suggests that the CLHTES index of the YRDIDZ may sustain a general upward tendency during 2024–2030, with a possibility of approaching Level VII after 2028; however, these projections should be interpreted as exploratory and scenario-like rather than as robust forecasts, given the short annual series and the absence of exogenous disturbance variables. This study explores tourism-ecology interactions from a social-ecological complex system perspective, supporting synergistic tourism development and ecological protection of cultural landscape heritage.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuang Du & Zhengji Yang & Xiaoli Li, 2026. "Tourism Ecological Security of Cultural Landscape Heritage: Dynamic Assessment and Prediction Using an Improved DPSIR-TOPSIS-RBF Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-35, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3797-:d:1918182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3797-:d:1918182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.