IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3742-d1917261.html

Energy Use Efficiency and Carbon Footprint of Inorganic Fertilizer and Liquid Animal Manure in Maize Production Under Semi-Arid Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Ergün Çıtıl

    (Department of Agricultural Machineries and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Selcuk University, Konya 42130, Turkey)

  • Kazım Çarman

    (Department of Agricultural Machineries and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Selcuk University, Konya 42130, Turkey)

  • Osman Özbek

    (Department of Agricultural Machineries and Technologies Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Selcuk University, Konya 42130, Turkey)

  • Nicoleta Ungureanu

    (Department of Biotechnical Systems, Faculty of Biotechnical Systems Engineering, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Nicolae-Valentin Vlăduț

    (National Institute of Research—Development for Machines and Installations Designed for Agriculture and Food Industry—INMA Bucharest, 013813 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Improving energy efficiency and reducing the carbon footprint of crop production are critical for sustainable agriculture, particularly in semi-arid regions where resource use efficiency is essential. This study evaluated the effects of different fertilization strategies on energy use efficiency and carbon footprint in maize production. A field experiment was conducted during the 2023 growing season in Konya Province, Türkiye, using a randomized block design with three treatments and three replications. The treatments included an unfertilized control (U1), inorganic fertilizer application (U2), and liquid animal manure application (U3). The results showed that the highest grain yield was obtained in the liquid manure treatment, which was 2.08 times higher than the unfertilized treatment and 1.18 times higher than the inorganic fertilizer treatment. The highest total energy input was recorded in the inorganic fertilizer treatment (26,235.12 MJ ha −1 ), while the highest total energy output was observed in the liquid manure treatment (203,154 MJ ha −1 ). The liquid manure treatment also showed higher net energy efficiency, output–input ratio, carbon efficiency, and carbon sustainability index, while producing the lowest carbon footprint per unit of product. These findings indicate that liquid animal manure can improve maize productivity while enhancing energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions in semi-arid agroecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ergün Çıtıl & Kazım Çarman & Osman Özbek & Nicoleta Ungureanu & Nicolae-Valentin Vlăduț, 2026. "Energy Use Efficiency and Carbon Footprint of Inorganic Fertilizer and Liquid Animal Manure in Maize Production Under Semi-Arid Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3742-:d:1917261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3742/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3742/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3742-:d:1917261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.