IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3739-d1917150.html

The Impact of Sales Modes: Implementing Trade-in Programs in E-Commerce Supply Chains and Selecting Recycling Channels

Author

Listed:
  • Junyi Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

  • Yinyuan Si

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

  • Lingrui Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China)

Abstract

As an effective approach to boosting consumption and facilitating the recycling of consumer goods, trade-in programs have been widely adopted by branders and e-commerce platforms. A platform supply chain system comprising e-commerce platforms and branders is investigated in this paper for this purpose. We construct a two-stage dynamic game model encompassing eight scenarios, discussing the provision of trade-in programs and product recycling issues under the resale and agency selling modes. Below are the key findings: (1) Trade-In Programs: In the resale mode, both branders and platforms prefer to adopt self-recycling when market potential is large, while opting for recycling undertaken by the other party when market potential is small. In the agency selling mode, branders prefer to adopt self-recycling (B-II) when fixed costs are high and the salvage value of used products is high, while platforms choose platform-led recycling (P-II) when fixed costs are low and the salvage value of used products is high. (2) Product Recycling: In the resale mode, branders should opt for self-recycling when facing high fixed costs, small market potential, and high salvage values, while outsourcing is more appropriate when salvage values are low. When the market potential is low, the platform ought to prefer self-recycling if the salvage value is either sufficiently high or sufficiently low; otherwise, outsourcing is preferable. In the agency selling mode, when the salvage value of used products is relatively high, platforms tend to have a free-riding mentality. When platforms provide trade-in programs, they will prioritize self-recycling if the salvage value is higher. In contrast, branders consistently achieve maximum profits when platforms adopt self-recycling. (3) Selection of Selling Mode: Branders always prefer the agency selling mode, while platforms’ mode selection depends on the trade-off between salvage value and commission rate. This study provides strategic insights for platform-based supply chain decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Junyi Zhang & Yinyuan Si & Lingrui Zhu, 2026. "The Impact of Sales Modes: Implementing Trade-in Programs in E-Commerce Supply Chains and Selecting Recycling Channels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-51, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3739-:d:1917150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3739/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3739/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3739-:d:1917150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.