IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3735-d1917080.html

Sustainability of Building Stock Rehabilitation: CO 2 e Footprint of Energy Renovation and Seismic Strengthening, a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Viorel Popa

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, 020396 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Bogdan Gheorghe

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Civil Engineering of Bucharest, 020396 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

For increasing the sustainability of existing building stock, energy renovation programs for existing buildings are being implemented worldwide with the aim of reducing the CO 2 e footprint associated with building operation. In countries with high seismicity, the long-term effectiveness of energy renovation programs is called into question, since a strong earthquake can severely affect existing buildings and compromise the sustainability of the implemented works. As a result, the design of energy renovation programs in seismically active countries must explicitly account for seismic risk. Integrated intervention programs were developed, in which energy renovation measures are implemented simultaneously with seismic strengthening interventions. Romania represents a particular case due to the specificity of the intermediate-depth Vrancea seismic source, which strongly affects more than 60% of the national territory, covering over 120,000 km 2 . Consequently, a large existing building stock is susceptible to seismic damage in the event of a major earthquake. This paper proposes the assessment of the specific CO 2 e footprint of the Romanian residential building stock for the two types of interventions. The results show that preventive seismic strengthening has the lowest CO 2 e footprint when compared to reactive seismic strengthening, the computed values for different scenarios ranging between 6 kg/m 2 and 45 kg/m 2 in case of preventive retrofitting and 23 kg/m 2 to 121 kg/m 2 in case of reactive retrofitting. Energy renovation leads to midrange values of 27 kg/m 2 to 58 kg/m 2 . Nevertheless, all calculated values are significantly lower than the specific CO 2 e footprint associated with new construction, proving the sustainability of existing building stock rehabilitation techniques. The research presented in this paper can be further extended through the implementation of scenario-based analyses concerning the improvement of the existing building stock through seismic strengthening and energy renovation, considering the occurrence of a major earthquake, in order to determine the optimal solution for the implementation of national programs in relation to the assumed objective of reducing CO 2 e emissions at the building stock level.

Suggested Citation

  • Viorel Popa & Bogdan Gheorghe, 2026. "Sustainability of Building Stock Rehabilitation: CO 2 e Footprint of Energy Renovation and Seismic Strengthening, a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3735-:d:1917080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3735/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3735/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3735-:d:1917080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.