IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3723-d1916878.html

Bridging the Gap Between Perception and Measurement: Thermal Comfort Analysis of a Green Building Facility in Riyadh

Author

Listed:
  • Hala Sirror

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Design, Prince Sultan University, P.O. Box 66833, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Asad Ullah Khan

    (Qatar Green Leaders, Jeddah P.O. Box 23437, Saudi Arabia)

  • Zeinab Abdallah M. Elhassan

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Design, Prince Sultan University, P.O. Box 66833, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Salma Dwidar

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Design, Prince Sultan University, P.O. Box 66833, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Rosniza Othman

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Design, Prince Sultan University, P.O. Box 66833, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Yasmeen Gul

    (Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Design, Prince Sultan University, P.O. Box 66833, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study examines the gap concerning occupants’ perceived thermal comfort and objectively measured indoor conditions in a green university building in Riyadh. The purpose is to assess occupant satisfaction with thermal conditions, compare subjective responses with physical measurements, and derive design and operational implications for educational buildings in hot-arid climates. The primary aim was to assess occupant satisfaction with indoor thermal conditions and to measure key environmental parameters to provide a thorough assessment of thermal comfort. A cross-sectional approach was used, combining subjective data from the Center for the Built Environment (CBE) Occupant Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) survey with objective measurements of air temperature, relative humidity, mean radiant temperature, and air velocity, which were documented over five consecutive working days during the mid-winter period in Riyadh. These parameters were explored using the CBE Thermal Comfort Tool to calculate Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) indices. Statistical analyses examined the relationship between occupant-reported comfort and measured environmental conditions. Results showed that only 36% of occupants reported satisfaction with thermal comfort, while 48% expressed dissatisfaction. In contrast, objective measurements indicated stable indoor conditions within recommended comfort ranges (average temperature 23 °C, humidity 30–34%, MRT 24 °C, air velocity 0.5–1.0 m/s), with PMV values near neutral (−0.2 to 0.0) and PPD below 6%. The observed discrepancy highlights the influence of regional climate, individual adaptability, and perceived control. These findings emphasize the need to integrate both subjective feedback and objective measurements to develop occupant-centered strategies that enhance comfort and well-being in sustainable educational buildings in hot-arid climates.

Suggested Citation

  • Hala Sirror & Asad Ullah Khan & Zeinab Abdallah M. Elhassan & Salma Dwidar & Rosniza Othman & Yasmeen Gul, 2026. "Bridging the Gap Between Perception and Measurement: Thermal Comfort Analysis of a Green Building Facility in Riyadh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3723-:d:1916878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3723/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3723/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3723-:d:1916878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.