IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3656-d1915677.html

Sustainability Assessment of Onshore Wind Farms: A Case Study in the Region of Thessaly

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Ourtzani

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Dimitra G. Vagiona

    (Department of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Renewable energy sources, and wind energy in particular, constitute a central pillar of energy policy at both national and European levels. Nevertheless, the deployment of onshore wind farms is frequently associated with spatial, environmental, and social conflicts, making the evaluation of existing projects imperative. The present study aimed to assess the sustainability of existing onshore wind farms in the Region of Thessaly, with particular emphasis on their spatial planning, technical characteristics, and environmental impacts. The methodological framework consists of four distinct stages: (i) identification and spatial mapping of existing wind farms in the study area, (ii) assessment of the compliance of existing wind installations with the Specific Framework for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development for Renewable Energy Sources (SFSPSD–RES), (iii) application of the Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix (RIAM) to enable a systematic and comparable evaluation of the impacts of wind installations on specific environmental and anthropogenic parameters, and (iv) estimation of project hazard and operational vulnerability through the application of Operational Risk Management (ORM). Geographic Information Systems (GISs) were employed for data processing and spatial analysis. The assessment showed that 40% of the evaluated wind farms fully comply with all eleven exclusion criteria of the SFSPSD-RES, whereas the remaining 60% show partial compliance, failing to meet between one and three criteria. RIAM results indicate that the most significant adverse impacts (−D and −C) during construction are associated with morphology/soils and the natural environment, mainly due to loss/fragmentation of vegetation and disturbance of fauna, and, in some cases, in areas of increased sensitivity. During operation, the main negative effects (−D and −C) relate to landscape and visual quality, as well as continued disturbance to the natural environment. At the same time, the operation generates important positive effects (+E) on the atmospheric environment through reduced CO 2 emissions. The ORM analysis further shows that the most important risks for most wind farms arise during construction (ORM = 2 and 3), particularly from serious worker accidents during lifting, roadworks, and foundation activities. The study demonstrates that the sustainability of existing wind installations depends on a complex set of spatial, environmental, and technical factors. The proposed framework integrates spatial compliance screening, RIAM-based environmental impact assessment, and ORM-based risk and opportunity evaluation. This connection links the importance of impacts with their operational manageability during construction and operation phases, as well as across sustainability dimensions. Consequently, the study provides a more decision-focused approach for assessing existing wind farms and supporting policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Ourtzani & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2026. "Sustainability Assessment of Onshore Wind Farms: A Case Study in the Region of Thessaly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-32, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3656-:d:1915677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3656-:d:1915677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.