Author
Listed:
- Saleh Altwaijri
(Department of Urban Planning, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia)
- Saleh Alotaibi
(Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Rabigh Branch, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21911, Saudi Arabia)
- Faisal Alosaimi
(Department of Infrastructure Projects, Riyadh Municipality, Riyadh 12611, Saudi Arabia
Collage of Architecture and Planning, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia)
- Adel Almutairi
(Department of Infrastructure Projects, Riyadh Municipality, Riyadh 12611, Saudi Arabia)
- Abdulaziz Alauany
(Department of Infrastructure Projects, Riyadh Municipality, Riyadh 12611, Saudi Arabia)
Abstract
Road traffic accidents at intersections pose a persistent challenge in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, contributing significantly to public health burdens and economic losses. Traditional statistical approaches often fail to capture the complex, non-linear interactions among geometric design, traffic parameters, and accident severity. This study develops a multi-methodological machine learning framework to predict intersection accident severity using the Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) metric. Historical data (2017–2023) from Riyadh Municipality for 150 high-risk intersections were analyzed, incorporating predictors such as service road distance (SRD), U-turn distance (UTD), median width (MW), peak hour volume (PHV), heavy vehicle percentage (HV%), and injury/frequency counts. Six algorithms, i.e., Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, Linear Regression, and Artificial Neural Network, were compared using a 70/30 train–test split and k-fold cross-validation in this study. The Gradient Boosting model achieved superior performance (R 2 = 0.89 with MSE = 63.43 and RMSE = 7.96) and was selected for final deployment. SHAP feature importance analysis revealed minor injuries (MIs), serious injuries (SRIs), and fatalities (FAs) as the most important dominant predictors, with geometric factors (UTD, MW) and traffic composition (HV%) providing actionable infrastructure insights. The model ranked intersections and identified the “Jeddah Road with Taif Road” (predicted EPDO = 137.22) as the highest-risk location. Evidence-based recommendations include enforcing the minimum 300 m U-turn buffers with staggering service road exits ≥150 m and restricting heavy vehicles during peak hours. The scalable framework developed in this study supports the data-driven prioritization of safety interventions and aligns with sustainable urban mobility goals and offers transferability to other metropolitan contexts worldwide.
Suggested Citation
Saleh Altwaijri & Saleh Alotaibi & Faisal Alosaimi & Adel Almutairi & Abdulaziz Alauany, 2026.
"A Multi-Model Machine Learning Framework for Predicting and Ranking High-Risk Urban Intersections in Riyadh,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-22, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3651-:d:1915549
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3651-:d:1915549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.