IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i8p3648-d1915494.html

Waste Management Routes for Oil and Gas Decommissioned Flexible Pipelines in Brazil: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

Author

Listed:
  • Isabela Fernandes de Oliveira

    (Department of Production Engineering, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, Brazil)

  • Ana Carolina Maia Angelo

    (Department of Production Engineering, Volta Redonda School of Industrial and Metallurgical Engineering, Federal Fluminense University (UFF), Volta Redonda 27255-125, Brazil)

  • Lucas Rosse Caldas

    (Civil Engineering Program, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, Brazil)

  • Marcelo Igor Lourenço de Souza

    (Ocean Engineering Department, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, Brazil)

Abstract

Decommissioning poses a challenge for decision-makers. As an aspect of decommissioning that is not explicitly outlined in regulations, waste management for decommissioned materials is a special challenge. In Brazil, a large amount of the decommissioned subsea infrastructure is composed of flexible pipelines, with interlocked structures that increase the recycling challenge. This study identified two technological routes to dismantle the pipes. These routes (A and B), consisting of processes centered on the shredding and the manual dismantling of the pipes, respectively, were analyzed through a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study. This study offers valuable insight into the waste management of decommissioned subsea infrastructure by quantifying the potential environmental impacts associated to the two main pre-processing strategies for the recycling of decommissioned flexible pipes in Brazil. Each route presented different levels of mechanization, energy consumption, productivity, labor intensity, types and levels of occupational hazards and recycling options for the resulting polymeric materials. The results from this study indicate that Route B is more aligned with the principles of a circular economy, enabling the mechanical recycling of 98% of the polymeric material and presenting substantially lower potential environmental impacts. In particular, Route B represents approximately 9.6% of the global warming impact (kg CO 2 eq) associated with Route A. Overall, its impacts vary from 1.47% (marine eutrophication) to 12.18% (ozone formation) of those associated with Route A across the different impact categories.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabela Fernandes de Oliveira & Ana Carolina Maia Angelo & Lucas Rosse Caldas & Marcelo Igor Lourenço de Souza, 2026. "Waste Management Routes for Oil and Gas Decommissioned Flexible Pipelines in Brazil: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3648-:d:1915494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3648/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/8/3648/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:8:p:3648-:d:1915494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.