Author
Listed:
- Jiachen Sun
(School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Malaysia)
- Atasya Osmadi
(School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Malaysia)
- Shan Liu
(School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore 639798, Singapore)
- Hengbing Yin
(School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Malaysia)
Abstract
As a significant source of global carbon emissions, the construction industry (CI) urgently needs to promote green transformation with the help of digital twin (DT) against the backdrop of human–machine collaboration and sustainable development advocated by CI 5.0. However, there is still a lack of systematic research on its specific driving mechanism and carbon reduction path. This study uses a systematic literature review (SLR) to explore how five key DT-enabled capabilities, namely, resource management (RM), process optimization (PO), real-time monitoring (R-Tm), sustainable design (SD), and predictive maintenance (PM), influence three performance indicators: efficiency improvement (EI), energy optimization (EO), and cost control (CC). Data from 490 companies were analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) with Shapley additive explanation (SHAP). The results show that the PLS-SEM and MLP models showed consistent patterns, with EO exhibiting the strongest predictive performance (Q 2 = 0.372; R 2 = 0.3666), followed by EI (Q 2 = 0.307; R 2 = 0.3109) and CC (Q 2 = 0.305; R 2 = 0.2609); the SHAP results further indicated that RM contributed most to EI (0.242), while PO was the most important driver for both EO (0.304) and CC (0.259). Academically, it introduces a quantitative approach combining PLS-SEM and machine learning. Practically, it highlights the priority of key technologies with cross-dimensional effects and offers guidance for governments to optimize digital resource allocation and carbon performance evaluation, as well as for enterprises to apply DT more effectively.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3637-:d:1915410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.