IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3632-d1915284.html

Social Network Centrality and Fertilizer Reduction: Evidence from a 14-Year Panel Study of Smallholder Farmers in Northwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu Cheng

    (College of Agricultural Economics and Management, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Qianheng Chen

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Excessive fertilizer use not only harms agricultural sustainability but also leads to massive energy waste and carbon emissions. Under China’s carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, using social networks to spread better fertilization practices and reduce excessive application can deliver real wins for both energy savings and emission cuts. This paper examines whether farmers’ social network positions affect their fertilizer use. We analyze 14 years of data from 206 farm households in Gansu, China, using fixed effects models that incorporate degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality. Our results reveal that centrally positioned farmers substantially reduce fertilizer application: each 0.1 unit rise in standardized degree, betweenness, and closeness centrality corresponds to reductions of 1.26%, 0.84%, and 0.78%, which translate to actual reductions and carbon emission reduction of 1.06, 0.71, and 0.66 kg/mu; 9.52, 6.38, and 5.93 kg CO 2 e/mu. The effects are stronger for farmers with more education, higher off-farm income, and tighter network connections. The effect of degree centrality on fertilizer reduction increased by 7.2 percentage points after 2018. Extension services should build on existing social networks and use key node farmers to drive other farmers in the village to reduce fertilizer use. It helps reduce carbon emissions from fertilizer production and promote sustainable agricultural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu Cheng & Qianheng Chen, 2026. "Social Network Centrality and Fertilizer Reduction: Evidence from a 14-Year Panel Study of Smallholder Farmers in Northwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3632-:d:1915284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3632/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3632/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3632-:d:1915284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.