IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i7p3569-d1914444.html

An Integrated Framework for Balancing Workload and Capacity in Project-Based Organizations Using System Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed Okasha Elnady

    (Civil & Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, North Campus, University of Alberta, 7th Floor, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Mohammad Masfiqul Alam Bhuiyan

    (Civil & Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, North Campus, University of Alberta, 7th Floor, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

  • Ahmed Hammad

    (Civil & Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, North Campus, University of Alberta, 7th Floor, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada)

Abstract

Project-based organizations (PBOs) face persistent challenges in managing workload fluctuations that influence performance, competitiveness, and resource sustainability. Although previous research has explored bidding strategies and project inflows and outflows, few studies have systematically modeled workload-capacity dynamics or assessed policy responses to manage them effectively. To address this gap, this study develops a system dynamics (SD) model that integrates both pre-award and post-award project phases with internal and external organizational processes. Data for model development were drawn from the literature, industry reports, and expert interviews, resulting in the identification of 28 variables organized into subsystems covering demand, capacity planning, work execution, competitiveness, and financial performance. The model was validated through dimensional and structural tests, expert review, and further examined using social network analysis (SNA) and sensitivity analysis. The SNA results identified workload, production rate, and organizational capacity as the most influential variables. Sensitivity analysis conducted through Monte Carlo experiments, employing screening, regression, and ANOVA (analysis of variance) methods, revealed that capacity adjustment flexibility, minimum capacity, and demand level are critical factors influencing organizational stability. The validated model was then applied to evaluate policy alternatives under two distinct market conditions. Findings indicate that in lowest-price environments, a competitive, market-share-oriented policy enhances utilization and responsiveness, whereas in average-price markets, a stable capacity policy yields more sustainable outcomes. These results demonstrate how project-based organizations can strategically adjust bidding and capacity policies to stabilize workload dynamics and improve long-term operational resilience under different market conditions. The study contributes theoretically by extending the application of SD modeling to workload-capacity management in PBOs and contributes practically by offering a decision-support tool that helps managers assess capacity strategies, reduce risks, and align organizational policies with long-term sustainability objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed Okasha Elnady & Mohammad Masfiqul Alam Bhuiyan & Ahmed Hammad, 2026. "An Integrated Framework for Balancing Workload and Capacity in Project-Based Organizations Using System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3569-:d:1914444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3569/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/7/3569/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3569-:d:1914444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.