Author
Listed:
- Yue Shi
(School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Lei Wu
(School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
- Zihang Wang
(School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)
Abstract
Green and Sustainable Remediation (GSR) has gained widespread recognition in contaminated site remediation. Several countries and international organizations have issued standards and guidelines for GSR frameworks, such as ISO 18504:2017 and the guideline developed by the Sustainable Remediation Forum UK. However, these frameworks remain largely qualitative and lack quantitative, operational tools for comparing remediation technologies, such as chemical oxidation, thermal desorption, and biopiles. To address this gap, this study develops a prospective decision-making model based on GSR. The model selects three environmental indicators, two economic indicators, and one social indicator, determines their weights using the entropy weight method, and adopts VIsekriterijumska optimizacija i KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR) for compromise ranking under conflicting criteria. Applied to a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated site in the Yangtze River Delta region of China, the model yields a stable ranking of biopiles > chemical oxidation > thermal desorption across different compromise scenarios, and sensitivity analysis confirms its robustness. A complementary Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using SimaPro 9.6.0.1 further identifies environmental impact sources and supports GSR improvement recommendations. The results indicate that the environmental impacts of thermal desorption are dominated by tail-gas treatment and backfilling, whereas those of biopiles mainly originate from nutrient and material inputs.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:7:p:3553-:d:1914000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.